FTC Sends $5.4 Million in Refunds to Consumers Defrauded by Online Trading Academy
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has announced that over 31,000 consumers will receive refunds totaling more than $5.4 million for being misled by Online Trading Academy (“OTA”), a company accused of making deceptive claims about its investment training programs. The refunds come as a result of a settlement with the California-based company, which has faced significant legal scrutiny for allegedly using false and unsubstantiated claims to sell its training courses.
The case began in February 2020 when the FTC filed a complaint against OTA and its founder, Eyal Shachar, accusing the company of using misleading marketing tactics to promote expensive investment training programs, some priced at up to $50,000. According to the FTC, OTA falsely claimed that its "patented strategy" could help anyone generate substantial income from trading, regardless of market conditions. Furthermore, the company made unfounded assertions that its instructors—who were actually salespeople on commission—had achieved financial success through the use of the training programs they sold. These instructors were often portrayed as successful traders, but the FTC found that these claims were largely false and unsubstantiated.
As part of the settlement, OTA has agreed to refund over $5.4 million to consumers who were deceived by these marketing tactics. On average, each of the 31,144 affected consumers will receive about $175. In addition to the refunds, OTA has also forgiven over $13.3 million in consumer debt. This action is aimed at addressing the financial harm caused to individuals who were led to believe they could achieve significant returns by purchasing OTA's programs.
The refund process highlights the FTC's commitment to holding companies accountable for deceptive business practices and protecting consumers from fraudulent schemes. For businesses in the financial services and education sectors, this case serves as a stark reminder about the importance of truthfulness in advertising. Companies that make earnings claims must have evidence to back them up, and they must ensure that any representations made about their products or services are accurate and substantiated.
As the regulatory landscape continues to evolve, businesses must be diligent in ensuring that their marketing materials are compliant with consumer protection laws. Failing to do so not only damages a company’s reputation but can also result in costly legal consequences and financial settlements. In the case of OTA, the FTC said the settlement and subsequent refund process are a clear demonstration of the FTC’s commitment to consumer advocacy and the importance of transparency in business practices.
This case should prompt all companies to carefully review their marketing strategies and make sure they are providing clear, honest, and substantiated information to their customers. Consumer trust is essential for long-term success, and companies that prioritize integrity and transparency are better positioned to avoid the risks associated with deceptive practices.
If you would like to read more about this case and others, visit our Case Studies Library.
© 2021 Cliclaw.com
(Image Credit: iStock Photo)
This article is for information purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be relied on as legal advice for any particular matter.